123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360 |
- # Crop Water Relations {#Crop-Water-Relations}
- ## Crop water demand {#Crop-water-demand}
- Following \citet{sinclair1986waterand}, transpiration demand is modeled
- as a function of the current day's potential crop growth rate, estimated
- by the potential biomass accumulation associated with intercepted
- radiation ($\Delta Q_{r}$, see Equation \@ref(eq:BiomassProduction)),
- divided by the transpiration efficiency.
- \begin{equation}
- W_{d}=\frac{\Delta Q_{r}-R}{TE} (\#eq:soilWaterDemand)
- \end{equation}
- where $R$ is respiration rate and equal to zero in the current version
- of APSIM-Wheat, $TE$ is transpiration efficiency. $TE$ is related
- to the daylight averaged vapour pressure deficit ($VPD$, Equation \@ref(eq:VPD))
- and a multiple of CO\textsubscript{2} factor \citep{reyenga1999modelling}.
- \begin{equation}
- TE=f_{c,\,TE}\frac{f_{TE}}{VPD} (\#eq:TranspirationEfficiency)
- \end{equation}
- where $f_{c,\,TE}$ is the CO\textsubscript{2} factor for transpiration
- efficiency, which is a function of carbon dioxide concentration and
- is defined by parameters `x_co2_te_modifier` and `y_co2_te_modifier`
- in wheat.xml and linearly interpolated by APSIM (Fig. \@ref(fig:wdCO2TE)).
- $f_{c,\,TE}$ linearly increases from 1 to 1.37 when CO\textsubscript{2}
- concentration increases from 350 ppm to 700 ppm \citep{reyenga1999modelling}.
- $f_{TE}$ is the coefficient of transpiration efficiency, which values
- are defined in wheat.xml by parameters `transp_eff_cf` in
- wheat.xml for the different growth stages and are linearly interpolated
- by APSIM (Fig. \@ref(fig:wdCoefficientOfTE)).
- ```{r wdCO2TE,fig.cap='Relationship between factor of carbon dioxide for transpiration efficiency ($f_{c,\\, TE}$) and CO2 concentration.' }
- p <- wdVisXY(wheat_xml,
- "x_co2_te_modifier", "y_co2_te_modifier",
- xlab = "Carbon dioxide concentration",
- ylab = "Transpiration efficiency factor")
- print(p)
- ```
- ```{r wdCoefficientOfTE,fig.cap='Change in the coefficient of transpiration efficiency with growth stages.' }
- p <- wdVisXY(wheat_xml,
- "stage_code", "transp_eff_cf",
- xlab = "Stage",
- ylab = "Coefficient of \ntranspiration efficiency")
- print(p)
- ```
- $VPD$ is the vapour pressure deficit, which is estimated using the
- method proposed by \citet{tanner1983efficient} and only requires
- daily maximum and minimum temperatures.
- \begin{equation}
- VPD=f_{v}[6.1078\times\exp(\frac{17.269\times T_{max}}{237.3+T_{max}})-6.1078\times\exp(\frac{17.269\times T_{min}}{237.3+T_{min}})] (\#eq:VPD)
- \end{equation}
- In this method, it is assumed that the air is saturated at the minimum
- temperature. The saturated vapour pressure is calculated at both the
- maximum and minimum temperatures, and the default vapour pressure
- deficit for the day is taken as 75\% ($f_{v}$, defined by `svp_fract`
- in wheat.xml) of the difference between these two vapour pressures.
- Crop water demand is capped to below a given multiple of potential
- ET (taken as Priestly-Taylor Eo from the water balance module) as
- specified by \hyperlink{eo_crop_factor_default}{eo_crop_factor_default}
- in the wheat.xml file (default value 1.5). This limits water use to
- reasonable values on days with high VPD or in more arid environments.
- ## Potential and actual extractable soil water
- Potential and actual extractable soil water is the sum of root water
- contents available to the crop from each profile layer occupied by
- roots. If roots are only partially through a layer available soil
- water is scaled to the portion that contains roots. Potential extractable
- soil water ($\text{ESW}_{p}$) is the difference between drained
- upper limit soil water content (DUL) and lower limit of plant-extractable
- soil water (LL) for each soil layer. The actual extractable soil water
- ($esw_{a}$) is the difference between the soil water content (SW)
- and lower limit of plant-extractable soil water (LL) for each soil
- layer.
- \begin{equation}
- \begin{array}{c}
- \text{ESW}_{p}(i)=\text{DUL}(i)-\text{LL}(i)\\
- \text{ESW}a(i)=\text{SW}(i)-\text{LL}(i)\\
- \text{ESW}_{p}=\sum_{i=1}^{I}[\text{DUL}(i)-\text{LL}(i)]\\
- \text{ESW}_{a}=\sum_{i=1}^{I}[\text{SW}(i)-\text{LL}(i)]
- \end{array} (\#eq:SoilWaterESW)
- \end{equation}
- where $i$ indicates soil layers (where roots are present), and $I$
- indicates the deepest soil water of root presented. Similar variables
- are calculated for the entire soil profile (i.e. roots may not occupy
- all the layers).
- \begin{equation}
- \begin{array}{c}
- \text{PAWC}=\sum_{i}^{N_{s}}[\text{DUL}(i)-\text{LL}(i)]\\
- \text{ESW}=\sum_{i}^{N_{s}}[\text{SW}(i)-\text{LL}(i)]
- \end{array}
- \end{equation}
- where $i$ indicates soil layers, $N_{s}$ indicates the number of
- soil layers, and PAWC is the plant available water capacity.
- ## Crop water supply, i.e. potential soil water uptake
- The APSIM-Wheat module can be coupled to either the SWIM2 module (see
- module documentation) or the SOILWAT2 module (default). When the APSIM-Wheat
- module is coupled to APSIM-SOILWAT2, potential soil water uptake (or
- water supply, $W_{s}$) is calculated using the approach first advocated
- by Monteith (1986). Crop water supply is considered as the sum of
- potential root water uptake from each profile layer occupied by root.
- If roots are only partially through a layer available soil water is
- scaled to the portion that contains roots. The potential rate of extraction
- in a layer is calculated using a rate constant (KL) as actual extractable
- soil water. The KL defines the fraction of available water able to
- be extracted per day. The KL factor is empirically derived, incorporating
- both plant and soil factors which limit rate of water uptake. Root
- water extraction values (KL) must be defined for each combination
- of crop species and soil type.
- \begin{equation}
- \begin{array}{c}
- \begin{array}{cc}
- W_{s}(i) & =\text{KL}(i)[\text{SW}(i)-\text{LL}(i)]\qquad\qquad if\,i\leq I-1\\
- & =\frac{D_{r}(i)}{D_{s}(i)}\text{KL}(i)[\text{SW}(i)-\text{LL}(i)]\qquad\qquad if\,i=I
- \end{array}\\
- W_{s}=\sum_{i=1}^{I}W_{s}(i)
- \end{array} (\#eq:WaterSupply)
- \end{equation}
- where $i$ is the soil layer, $I$ is the deepest soil layer where
- roots are present, $W_{s}(i)$ is the water supply available from
- layer $i$, $W_{s}$ is the crop water supply, $\text{SW}(i)$ is
- the soil water content in layer $i$, $\text{LL}(i)$ is the lower
- limit of plant-extractable soil water in layer $i$, $\text{KL}(i)$
- is the root water extraction values in layer $i$, $D_{r}(i)$ is
- the root depth within the soil layer ($i$) where roots are present,
- and $D_{s}(i)$ is the thickness of this layer $i$.
- ## Actual soil water uptake
- The actual rate of water uptake is the lesser of the potential soil
- water supply ($W_{s}$, Equation \@ref(eq:WaterSupply)) and the soil water
- demand ($W_{d}$, Equation \@ref(eq:soilWaterDemand)), which is determining
- whether biomass production is limited by radiation or water uptake
- (Equation \@ref(eq:actualBiomassProduction))
- \begin{equation}
- W_{u}=\min(W_{d},\,W_{s}) (\#eq:WaterUpdate)
- \end{equation}
- If the potential soil water supply (accessible by the roots) exceeds
- the crop water demand, then the actual soil water uptake ($W_{u}$)
- is removed from the occupied layers in proportion to the values of
- potential root water uptake in each layer. If the computed soil water
- supply from the profile is less than the demand then, and the actual
- root water uptake from a layer is equal to the computed potential
- uptake. If there are not soil water supply and demand, soil water
- update equals to zero.
- \begin{equation}
- \begin{array}{c}
- \Delta W_{s}(i)=-W_{s}(i)\times\frac{W_{d}}{W_{s}}\qquad if\;W_{s}<W_{d}\\
- \Delta W_{s}(i)=-W_{s}(i)\qquad if\;W_{s}>W_{d}\\
- \Delta W_{s}(i)=0\qquad if\;W_{s}=W_{d}=0
- \end{array}
- \end{equation}
- where $\Delta W_{s}(i)$ is the daily change in soil water content
- at layer $i$ (where roots are present), and $W_{s}(i)$ is the water
- supply available from layer $i$ (Equation \@ref(eq:WaterSupply)) .
- ## Soil water stresses affecting plant growth
- Soil water deficit factors are calculated to simulate the effects
- of water stress on different plant growth-and-development processes.
- Three water deficit factors are calculated which correspond to four
- plant processes, each having different sensitivity to water stress
- i.e. photosynthesis, leaf expansion, and phenology.
- Each of these factors is capped between 0 and 1, where the value of
- 0 corresponds to a complete stress, while 1 corresponds to no stress.
- Leaf expansion is considered more sensitive to stress than photosynthesis,
- while soil water has no impact on crop phenology in the current APSIM-Wheat
- version.
- ### Phenology
- Soil water stress of phenology is determined by the soil water deficiency.
- \begin{equation}
- f_{W,\,pheno}=h_{w,\,pheno}(\frac{esw_{a}}{esw_{p}}) (\#eq:SoilWaterStress)
- \end{equation}
- where $esw_{a}$ is the actual extractable soil water in root layers,
- $esw_{p}$ is the potential extractable soil water in root layers.
- $h_{w,\,pheno}$ is a function of soil water available ratio and soil
- water stress, which is defined by parameters `x_sw_avail_ratio`
- and `y_swdef_pheno` (default value 1) in wheat.xml and linearly
- interpolated by APSIM. In the current version of APSIM-Wheat module,
- no soil water stress for phenology is applied (Fig. \@ref(fig:wdSoilWaterStressPhenology)).
- The soil water stress of phenology for flowering (`x_sw_avail_ratio_flowering`
- and `y_swdef_pheno_flowering`) and grain filling (`x_sw_avail_ratio_start_grain_fill`
- and `y_swdef_pheno_start_grain_fill`) phases are calculated
- in the source code, but don't have influence on the phenology of wheat
- in the current APSIM-Wheat version (default value of 1).
- ```{r wdSoilWaterStressPhenology,fig.cap='Relationship between soil water stress factor affecting phenology ($f_{W,\\, pheno}$) and the ratio of available soil water ($\\frac{esw_{a}}{esw_{p}}$).' }
- p <- wdVisXY(wheat_xml,
- "x_sw_avail_ratio", "y_swdef_pheno ",
- xlab = "Ratio of available soil water",
- ylab = "Soil water stress \nof phenology")
- print(p)
- ```
- ### Photosynthesis
- Soil water stress of biomass accumulation ($f_{w,\,photo}$) is calculated
- as follows.
- \begin{equation}
- f_{w,\,photo}=\frac{W_{u}}{W_{d}} (\#eq:swstressphoto)
- \end{equation}
- where $W_{u}$ is the total daily water uptake from root system (Equation \@ref(eq:WaterUpdate)),
- $W_{d}$ is the soil water demand of `Leaf` and `Head`
- parts (Equation \@ref(eq:soilWaterDemand)).
- Finally, the potential biomass production (radiation-limited$\Delta Q$)
- can limit by water uptake ($f_{w,\,photo}<1$, i.e. when $W_{u}<W_{d}$),
- or not (when $f_{w,\,photo}=1$, i.e. when $W_{u}=W_{d}$)
- \begin{equation}
- \Delta Q_{w}=\Delta Q_{r}f_{w,\,photo}=\Delta Q_{r}\frac{W_{u}}{W_{d}} (\#eq:WaterStressBiomassProduction)
- \end{equation}
- $f_{w,photo}$ also affect the senescence of the leaves.
- ### Leaf expansion
- Soil water stress of leaf expansion is determined by the deficit of
- soil water.
- \begin{equation}
- f_{W,\,expan}=h_{w,\,expan}(\frac{W_{u}}{W_{d}}) (\#eq:WaterStressLeafExpansion)
- \end{equation}
- where $W_{u}$ is the crop water uptake (Equation \@ref(eq:WaterUpdate)),
- $W_{d}$ is the crop water demand (Equation \@ref(eq:soilWaterDemand)).
- $h_{w,\,expan}$ is a function of soil water content and stress, and
- is defined by parameters `x_sw_demand_ratio` and `y_swdef_leaf`
- in the wheat.xml, which is linearly interpolated by APSIM (Fig. \@ref(fig:wdWaterStress4LeafExpansion)).
- ```{r wdWaterStress4LeafExpansion,fig.cap='Relationship between the soil water stress factor affecting expansion ($f_{W,\\, expan}$) and supply:demand ratio ($\\frac{W_{e}}{W_{d}}$).' }
- p <- wdVisXY(wheat_xml,
- "x_sw_demand_ratio", "y_swdef_leaf",
- xlab = "Soil water supply:demand ratio",
- ylab = "Soil water stress of expansion")
- print(p)
- ```
- ## KL factor
- APSIM 7.5 introduces a modifying factor on KL (rate of maximum daily
- water uptake per day) where there is an excess of chloride concentration
- (Cl), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), or electrical conductivity
- (EC) properties in the soil \citep{hochman2007simulating}. The KL
- modifier is optional and triggered by setting the ModifyKL parameter
- to `yes`.
- When the KL modifier is activated, KL values are modified for each
- layer, by factors (concerning Cl, ESP, EC; Fig. \@ref(fig:wdKLFactoring))
- applied to default KL values. The modifiers are calculated using one
- of the limiting factors in order of preference (Cl, ESP, EC), i.e.
- KL is modified only if there are no soil parameters for Cl. The parameters
- in the wheat.xml that control this mechanism are ClA, CLB, ESPA, ESPB,
- ECA, ECB (slope and intercept of linear relationship for Cl, ESP and
- EC).
- ```{r wdKLFactoring,fig.height=6,fig.cap='The KL factor in response to chloride concentration (Cl mg kg$^{-1}$, Exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP, \\%) and soil electrical conductivity (EC, dS m$^{-1}$.' }
- p <- wdKLFactoring(wheat_xml)
- print(p)
- ```
|